Brett's Truck Parts & All Filters FUSO HINO Isuzu Nissan UD Mitsubishi. in Berkeley Vale, New South Wales | Automotive, aircraft & boat

Brett's Truck Parts & All Filters FUSO HINO Isuzu Nissan UD Mitsubishi.

Locality: Berkeley Vale, New South Wales

Phone: +61 2 4388 4994

Address: 17 Craftsman Ave 2261 Berkeley Vale, NSW, Australia

Website: http://www.brettstruck.com.au

Likes: 3395

Add/Update information

Reviews

Tags

• Automotive, aircraft & boat
• Vehicle parts store

25.01.2022 Vote for a public register revealing who owns our water was lost 45-41. These are the 45 who voted it down. Please share. Their voters deserve to know.

24.01.2022 Great prices, quality, quick delivery and well packaged items. Will definitely purchase from them again with peace of mind. adrian-f455 https://www.wordofmouth.com.au//bretts-truck-parts-and-all

23.01.2022 Fast and quick to reply to request. A good understanding of what was needed. Delivery good b054445f https://www.wordofmouth.com.au//bretts-truck-parts-and-all

22.01.2022 Remember Election Night 2016? How liberal gloating turned to tears? The constipated faces of media pundits! Will November 3, 2020 be deja vu all over again?

17.01.2022 Extreme Crazy Offroad Power You will not believe what you see

13.01.2022 The best selling music artists from 1969 to 2019 (Worldwide Sales) From Data Is Beautiful

11.01.2022 after he tweeted the results of a Danish study indicating that masks are ineffective at preventing the spread of coronavirus

10.01.2022 Mr Luke Cornelius, who’s batshit crazy now? You and your forces have been acting illegally! If this does hit the HCA, It will shut down this illegal governmen...t, it’s [police] forces and all the nasty brainwashed sheep that have been living in fear since this all started. Article converted to audio/video in the attachment below if you rather listen to it. High Court likely to 'free' COVID's political prisoners The Australian, 23rd September 2020, by Mirko Bagaric The High Court is likely to rule the arrest of the Victorian freedom protesters in recent weeks was constitutionally illegal. The freedom of assembly is not absolute, but neither should any important freedom be absolutely abrogated. That is why the High Court is likely to rule the arrest of the Victorian freedom protesters in recent weeks was constitutionally illegal meaning that Australia has witnessed the detention of its first political prisoners. These are defined as people who are deprived of their liberty solely because of their non-violent freedom of peaceful assembly and association. The overreach by the Victorian government in forcibly detaining everyday people who disagree with its approach of carpet bombing the economy and civil rights to flatten the COVID-19 curve has stunned almost everyone. Internationally, some now see Australia as a human rights pariah and we may be shamed into silence when it comes to lecturing other countries on human rights abuses in the future. Fortunately, there is a likely remedy for the unprecedented assault on freedoms in Victoria. The Constitution contains the right to freedom of assembly. Victoria cannot override that. The High Court, in a series of cases in the early 1990s, implied the existence of a number of rights from the democratic and representative framework of the Constitution. In Australian Capital Television Pty Ltd v Commonwealth, the Court held that Australians had the freedom of political communication. In a number of other subsequent decisions, numerous judges have held that the freedom of association is a necessary incident of the freedom of communication, given that the ability to communicate is contingent upon people being able to gather together (Mulholland v Australian Electoral Commission). The High Court has expressly noted that implied freedoms can be limited, but only if restrictions are reasonably appropriate and adapted to serve a legitimate objective in a manner consistent with representative and responsible government. This is where arresting lockdown protesters becomes questionable. In order for a total ban on demonstrations to be justified, the Victorian government would need to show that this is proportionate to the ends of mitigating the harm caused by COVID-19. While it is established that the best way to limit infections is to break the chain of infection, the jurisprudential equation is not one-sided. It is also necessary to look at the damage caused by a total ban on freedom of assembly. This is where exhortations that we need to defeat the virus and we must follow the rules by Premier Daniel Andrews might not be enough. The High Court is likely to be far more influenced by the scientific observation from Victorian Chief Health Officer Brett Sutton that the likelihood of spreading the virus is 20 times less outdoors than indoors. And international responses will be relevant. Much has been learned about the risk-assessment calculus. No other developed country barricades its citizens in order to deal with the pandemic. They understand the health, economic and social side-effects are too burdensome, nor do they crack down other than in China as hard on those who would protest the lockdown. Even if it is permissible to restrict gatherings, it does not mean an absolute ban on them is acceptable. The limitation should go only as far as necessary. If, for example, protesters were required to wear masks, remain 2m apart and register before attending a protest, it is likely this would facilitate the exercise of the constitutional freedom without materially increasing the spread of the virus. A protest need not mean a rabble it can be orderly and controlled. Neither will the atmospherics be lost on the High Court. Victorian Police command has taken an eccentric approach to dealing with the protesters; rather than objectively enforcing the law, it refers to them as the tinfoil hat wearing brigade. You might expect that from one of Andrews’s ministers, but never from an independent executive branch of government. Their unalloyed hypocrisy in not arresting even one of the 10,000 Black Lives Matters protesters, while hunting down freedom protesters, will undermine the Victorian government’s case that all protests need to be banned. It also won’t be missed by the High Court that the freedom protesters have been law-abiding Victorians leading responsible lives. Their only crime is that they prefer freedom to non-freedom, unless there is a demonstrated need for the restrictions. Has an offender ever been less blameworthy? What is less in dispute is that the rule of law in Victoria is broken. Regularly in recent years, it is only intervention by the High Court that has shone a light on dark cases (including Lawyer X and George Pell) in Victoria. Nonetheless, it seems the Andrews government still sees itself as having some immunity from the core principles of democracy and the rule of law. Fortunately for Victorians, High Court judges have can cross the ring of steel and see justice done in their state. Source: https://www.theaustralian.com.au//68b63c9c4fe6a7bb78a0cba0 Source: https://www.swinburne.edu.au//high-court-likely-to-free-c/

09.01.2022 If you always do what you always did, you always get what you always got. It's time to break this destructive cycle.

07.01.2022 If you got a spare 10 minutes, worth a watch, she asked some simple questions, makes a lot of since...

07.01.2022 Friendly staff, Parts availability, quick postage, fast delivery & most important the correct parts robertb72 https://www.wordofmouth.com.au//bretts-truck-parts-and-all

06.01.2022 FACEBOOK AND TWITTER > CORRUPT GRUBS

05.01.2022 Stupid Trucking! Via ViralHog

01.01.2022 well priced parts,dispatched promptly.will do business with this company again. 962cd0cc https://www.wordofmouth.com.au//bretts-truck-parts-and-all

01.01.2022 Brett's Truck Parts has got me out of trouble a few times with hassle free transaction and helpful friendly staff johnj944 https://www.wordofmouth.com.au//bretts-truck-parts-and-all