Australia Free Web Directory

Danlegal Five Dock | Lawyer & law firm



Click/Tap
to load big map

Danlegal Five Dock

Phone: +61 2 9713 2000



Reviews

Add review



Tags

Click/Tap
to load big map

24.01.2022 If you had a car accident and were injured, give us a call. We can help with your compensation claim.



22.01.2022 Buying property? Get all the right advice and help at Danlegal & Co. We help make buying property as easy as 1, 2, 3 for you. So when you are ready, just give us a call 9029-4900.

17.01.2022 We fight and win to make them pay... Stand up, be counted, get justice for your suffering...

16.01.2022 Don't forget to smell the roses!!



14.01.2022 Looking for an Accredited Specialist in Personal Injury for your compensation matter? Then Danlegal & Co, is who you need to call on 9029-4900. We are the firm you can trust. ... No win, no pay.

12.01.2022 At DanLegal Compensation Lawyers......no case is too big or too small.....Our clients needs are always paramount.

11.01.2022 Daniela Sicurella - Solicitor B.A., Dip Ed., LLB., Dip Legal Practice., Accredited Specialist Personal Injury.



09.01.2022 Another Win!!! Court of Appeal, New South Wales Boral Resources (NSW) Pty Ltd v Gangi [2014] NSWCA 287... Hearing Dates 23-24 July 2014 Decision Date 28/08/2014 Before Basten JA at [1]; Gleeson JA at [2]; Leeming JA at [3] Decision 1. Appeal dismissed with costs. 2. Cross-appeal allowed in part. 3. Set aside the costs order made on 20 September 2013, and in lieu thereof order that Boral pay (a) Mr Gangi's costs thrown away by reason of the adjournment, and (b) 90% of the balance of Mr Gangi's costs of the proceedings. 4. Otherwise dismiss the cross-appeal. 5. Order that Boral pay 25% of Mr Gangi's costs of the cross-appeal. COSTS - challenge to special order that successful plaintiff be paid only a percentage of his costs - not unreasonable for defendant to refuse Calderbank offer - no error in rejecting submission that defence was improperly maintained - power to reduce costs even where a plaintiff obtained a substantial verdict in his favour - costs discretion re-exercised in light of other errors disclosed in reasons TORTS - negligence - owner and operator of concrete batching plant failed to inspect and maintain all structural elements - plant collapsed on truck driver - challenge to findings of liability and breach based on impermissible use of hindsight - challenge to drawing of inference from owner's failure to adduce evidence of results of forensic investigation into collapse - primary judge expressly found owner liable without needing to rely on inferences - damages - factual challenges to heads of economic and non-economic loss.

03.01.2022 Child abuse and the Catholic Church www.brokenrites.com.au

01.01.2022 Royal Commission into institutional responses to Child Sexual Abuse http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au

Related searches