Hancock Alldis Roskov Lawyers & Notaries Public in Hurstville, New South Wales, Australia | Lawyer & law firm

Hancock Alldis Roskov Lawyers & Notaries Public

Locality: Hurstville, New South Wales, Australia

Phone: +61 2 9579 6633

Address: Level 4/8 Crofts avenue 2220 Hurstville, NSW, Australia

Website: http://harlaw.com.au/

Likes: 51

Add/Update information

Reviews

Tags

• Lawyer & law firm

23.01.2022 LIVE STREAM OF SILK BOWS CEREMONY At 9.15 am tomorrow, Tuesday 13 October, the Supreme Court will live stream the Silk Bows Ceremony for newly appointed Senior Counsel. Watch the ceremony here: https://bit.ly/2GWNFMl

22.01.2022 Judgment Just In: The Court of Appeal has dismissed an appeal from a decision of a judge in the Equity Division of the Court, setting aside assessments of payro...ll tax made against Downer EDI Engineering Pty Ltd (Downer) by the Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (the Commissioner). The Court found that Downer did not have to pay payroll tax in accordance with certain exemptions in the Payroll Tax Act 2007 (NSW). Read the judgment here: https://bit.ly/2VyjQpw Summary: https://bit.ly/38eMZvj

22.01.2022 Australian researchers believe they're within reach of finding a cure for the coronavirus outbreak. They say that laboratory tests on two drugs are proving the...y're capable of stopping the virus in its tracks. www.7NEWS.com.au #7NEWS

21.01.2022 Judgment Just In: The Court of Appeal has dismissed an appeal with costs brought by Ms Mangano, the executor of the estate of her deceased father, Mr Mangano. ...Ms Mangano asserted that Mr Mangano and his partner Ms Bullen obtained their interests in a property by fraud after they received their interests in the property from a deregistered company. She sought to set aside particular transfers. The Court held that fraud was not established, and that even if fraud could be shown, there were others problems which would prevent the appeal from succeeding. Read the judgment here: https://bit.ly/2Uj6Tiy Summary: https://bit.ly/3loiGbg See more

17.01.2022 https://www.theguardian.com//australias-legal-accounting-a

11.01.2022 Judgment Just In: The Court of Appeal has partially allowed an appeal in relation to defamatory words spoken at the Annual General Meeting of a Go Kart club. Co...urt held that the primary judge erred in applying the test for imputations that differ in substance when determining whether the language pleaded by the applicant different from what was actually said. Leave to appeal was refused in relation to damages because the primary judge did not err in contingently assessing damages, and to remit the matter for reconsideration of aggravated damages would be disproportionate to the amount potentially at stake. Read the judgment here: https://bit.ly/34iliBw Summary: https://bit.ly/3dKMNH1 See more

10.01.2022 CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) ANNOUNCEMENT: UPCOMING CHANGES TO SITTING PROCEDURES The Court is implementing special sitting procedures from Monday, 23 March 2020 to ...minimise the spread of Coronavirus (COVID-19). The primary aim is to minimise the need for parties to come to the Court in the near future. Registrars' Lists will be conducted as much as possible either by the online court, where available, or by telephone link and, in the case of contentious matters, by videolink. A similar approach will be taken in Judges' Lists, subject to specific directions given by the judge administering the list. In relation to appeals or first instance matters, consideration will be given to dealing with the matters by telephone or Audio Visual Link (AVL). There will be no changes to the way the Criminal Lists, such as Bails and Arraignments, and current Supreme Court Jury trials are currently being heard. For further details see: https://bit.ly/2xxmNxJ

09.01.2022 Judgment Just In: The Court of Appeal has transferred representative proceedings against the Uber group of companies from NSW to Victoria, due to the commonalit...y of questions in the existing Victorian proceedings and the accommodation, by undertaking, of any risk of prejudice that may otherwise arise on transfer. Read the judgment here: https://bit.ly/35gprqz Summary: https://bit.ly/351EZ0X See more

09.01.2022 Judgment Just In: The Supreme Court has enforced a judgment of the Qingdao Intermediate People’s Court of Shandong Province, China, and ordered the defendants, ...Qu and Tian, to pay RMB 2,802,849 to the plaintiff, Bao. Read the judgment here: https://bit.ly/36fMsrR Summary: https://bit.ly/2ZfDWYs See more

09.01.2022 Judgment Just In: The Court of Criminal Appeal has by majority dismissed appeals by WG and KG against their convictions and sentences for numerous sexual offenc...es against their daughter. The Court held that the jury verdict was not unreasonable, that the absence of new evidence did not lead to a miscarriage of justice, and that the failure to discharge the jury was not an error. The Court also held that the sentences were not manifestly excessive, and that the sentencing judge did not err in her assessment of a number of matters relevant to sentence. Read the judgment here: https://bit.ly/38C2fCH Summary: https://bit.ly/38EYbRX

09.01.2022 Judgment Just In: The Supreme Court has made orders referring the parties to arbitration in the ongoing dispute between Bianca Rinehart and her mother, Gina Rin...ehart, and others in relation to the affairs of the Hope Margaret Hancock Trust. The Court has stayed the balance of the proceeding and has foreshadowed an intention to refer the parties to mediation. Read the judgment here: https://bit.ly/31To79c Summary: https://bit.ly/31TONqw See more

08.01.2022 Judgment Just In: The Supreme Court has upheld in part a claim made against the estate of the late Barbara Murphy brought by Mr Moore and Ms Andreasen on the ba...sis that the deceased had made promises to them if they looked after her as she aged. The Court found that the relevant promise was for the transfer of two properties in Louisa Road, Birchgrove; not for the entirety of the estate (valued at approximately $11 million), and ordered that the properties should be transferred to Mr Moore and Ms Andreasen. Read the judgment here: https://bit.ly/35xzUMD Summary: https://bit.ly/2J5EQRn See more

08.01.2022 Judgment Just In: The Court of Appeal has dismissed an appeal challenging an extended supervision order. The challenged included a ground that the trial judge ...was required to be satisfied that the applicant posed an unacceptable risk of committing another serious offence throughout the duration of the order. The Court held that s 5B of the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 is a gateway provision, and says nothing about the conditions or period of any order which may be made in the court’s discretion. Read the judgment here: https://bit.ly/2Hkcxhh Summary: https://bit.ly/2IKt1jb See more

08.01.2022 Judgment Just In: The Court of Appeal has dismissed an application for judicial review, holding that the primary judge did not fall into jurisdictional error in... finding that the District Court did not have jurisdiction to make directions for compensation under s 97 of the Victims Rights and Support Act 2013 (NSW) in the circumstances of the case. As it was the Local Court which convicted the offender of the relevant offences in the proceedings notwithstanding the confirmation of these convictions in the District Court, it was the Local Court, and not the District Court, to which directions for the payment of compensation under s 97 could and should have been sought. Read the judgment here: https://bit.ly/3h8lsPL Summary: https://bit.ly/3l2x6xN See more

05.01.2022 Judgment Just In: The Court of Appeal has unanimously allowed an appeal in relation to a loss of opportunity arising from the misleading or deceptive conduct of... the respondent engineering firm. The Court held that there was an overwhelming inference that the design defect was a material cause of the lender taking over the development and that was sufficient to establish causation of loss. Furthermore, the Court held that the claimed loss of opportunity was, at the very least, foreseeable in a general way. The Court also dismissed a cross appeal, holding that the assessment of damages for loss of opportunity exhibited many characteristics of a discretionary judgment and, in any event, the evidence provided ample basis for the conclusion reached by the primary judge in relation to a 15% discount on the damages recoverable. Read the judgment here: https://bit.ly/3kMAPin Summary: https://bit.ly/2HsFSGg See more

05.01.2022 Judgment Just In: The Supreme Court has sentenced Ms Wang, following a plea of guilty, to a an overall term of imprisonment of 25 years and 6 months, comprising... an overall non-parole period of 19 years and an additional term of 6 years and 6 months for the fatal stabbing of Ms Shuyu Zhou on 17 June 2019. Read the judgment here: https://bit.ly/3ijVEA3 Summary: https://bit.ly/36jdK2I See more

04.01.2022 Judgment Just In: The Court of Criminal Appeal has dismissed an appeal against a conviction of breaking and entering a dwelling house and committing a serious i...ndictable offence therein, in a circumstance of aggravation. Two grounds of appeal were raised relating to the directions given to the jury by the trial judge, the first was with respect to the effect of evidence given by the co-accused, and the second was with respect to the default position should the jury not be able to reach a unanimous verdict. The Court also dismissed the applicant’s appeal against sentence. Read the judgment here: https://bit.ly/2K23saO Summary: https://bit.ly/2VcSF4d See more

03.01.2022 Judgment Just In: The Court of Appeal has dismissed an application for leave to appeal from a judgment of the District Court summarily dismissing Mr Massarani’s... action for defamation. The Court refused an invitation to consider the question of proportionality discussed in Bleyer v Google Inc [2014] NSWSC 897 as the primary judge had made an orthodox ruling striking out parts of Mr Massarani’s pleading that failed to articulate elements of a reasonable claim. It was permissible in the circumstances for the primary judge to refuse leave to replead and consider the issue of proportionality in that context. Read the judgment here: https://bit.ly/3lDFvr9 Summary: https://bit.ly/3jT97jH See more