Jatt Lawyers | Legal service

Jatt Lawyers

Phone: +61 3 8712 5889

Add/Update information

Reviews

Tags

• Businesses
• Legal service
• Legal
• Divorce & Family Lawyer

23.01.2022 Whether a disputed Divorce Certificate under Sharia issued by the Pakistani Authority is acceptable in Australia? The answer is No. However, a divorce certificate supported by a court order may be acceptable by an Australian court. A case discussion for community information: https://www.jattlawyers.com.au/category/community-info/

20.01.2022 Professional legal service in Gippsland on weekend. Available on each weekend at 57 Market Street Sale, but only on pre-booked appointment, save COVID19 restrictions. Limited free legal service. For details please visit

11.01.2022 Is the law not an essential need or the legal professionals are not delivering? The future of legal practice in Pakistan faces serious challenges. The main cause is the lawyers themselves. It is getting difficult for the lawyers to offer legal solutions for the needs of a common man. It is ugly but it is a fact. The situation in the contemporary developing world is not different but my concern is Pakistan. Can somebody think over;... Ø Why legal service is not an essential service in Pakistan in COVID19? Ø Bread-butter and health are natural basic needs but why the legal profession is becoming irrelevant for the community? Save exceptions, the answers are simple; Ø The lawyers themselves practice extra-legal ways. Ø To become a successful lawyer legal expertise is a secondary element and the priority is to be active on TV shows. Ø The lawyers compromised their professional status and served the personal wishes of rulers for cheap personal gains at the cost of their professional pride and now the days have gone when a lawyer could lead a political party. Today’s lawyer is happy to be an aide of a professional politician. The COVID19 is a symbolic example, please correct me if the law practice is an essential service in Pakistan like many other jurisdictions in the world during this crisis. Please also advise if my concern and/or the answers are wrong. I wish improvement of the culture in the legal industry and believe that the lawyers in Pakistan have potential to better serve the community. Best wishes: Basharat Jatt

09.01.2022 An interesting movie drama; legal parenting, teaching parenting, institutional parenting, sibling parenting and community Parenting after loss of biological parenting. Just watch and enjoy for information and entertainment. A Mother's Love

08.01.2022 Islamic Marriage and Islamic Divorce if in Conflict with Australian Law: In [2009] FamCA 540 the marriage of a Muslim couple Mr DINAL & Ms TOHIM, pseudonym, was declared invalid by the Family Court of Australia. The divorce application was moved by the husband. The wife sought the proceedings be adjourned to an Australian Islamic body. For more see here; https://www.jattlawyers.com.au/the-issue-of-an-islamic-mar/

06.01.2022 A decision of a Shari'a court of Dubai was accepted in Australia as a final decision of all aspects of family law litigation between the parties. No matter a party opted not to participate in the overseas litigation. The domicile of the parties or the location of the assets is also irrelevant. In BANT & CLAYTON (NO. 2) [2019] FamCAFC 200, pseudonym, the court has answered some crucial questions: https://www.linkedin.com//international-family-law-dispu/

02.01.2022 Islamic Marriage - Islamic Divorce and Australian Law: In [2009] FamCA 540 the marriage of a Muslim couple Mr DINAL & Ms TOHIM, pseudonym, was declared invalid by the Family Court of Australia. https://www.jattlawyers.com.au/... The divorce application was moved by the husband. The wife sought the proceedings be adjourned to an Australian Islamic body. She maintained that the Egyptian divorce was not registered and therefore was not valid. She claimed that the divorce could not be finalised because she had not been returned her dowry entitlements. Besides, she argued the question of the registration of the supposed divorce document according to Egyptian law. The husband irrespective to the fact that initially he moved for a divorce order eventually sought two declarations; First, that the marriage that took place in Australia in 2000 was not a valid marriage under Australian law and secondly, the divorce under Egyptian law in 2008 was a valid divorce for all purposes of Australian law. It appeared that the parties had already divorced and wanted to marry again. The Court noted that the divorced parties wanted to marry again. The court observed that the process of remarriage as followed by the couple was not permitted by law in Australia. The Court at paragraph [4] noted that; What the husband did not say in his application for divorce was that he was married to the wife in Egypt according to Egyptian and Islamic law. The explanation for this apparent conflict was that he was married again to the wife on the advice of her parents, who told both husband and wife that they needed to do formalise the marriage in Australia. The Court dismissed the application. The court held that the husband and the wife were already divorced from each other in Egypt and that such divorce is valid for all purposes of Australian law.