Revolution Church Lismore | Religious organisation

Revolution Church Lismore

Add/Update information

Reviews

Tags

• Community organisation
• Religious organisation

24.01.2022 Kittle was still seen as a leading academic figure in Christianity until 1985. He still has a huge influence in the academy today.

20.01.2022 The bible society basically became the UNITARIAN bible society after 1831 filled with heretical people and compromisers. No wonder we have the issues in modern... bibles that we do today. And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many (Matt. 24:11). Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves (Matt. 7:15). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51Gzz0WeOf0 https://cdn.ymaws.com//04DBBA/Beginnings-of-TBS-Part-1.pdf https://cdn.ymaws.com//04DBBA/Beginnings-of-TBS-Part-2.pdf https://www.yumpu.com//1400/unholy-hands-on-gods-holy-book

16.01.2022 Dispensationalism

12.01.2022 https://youtu.be/zwbS9HpDYv0?t=21

08.01.2022 Most modern version supporters claim that no doctrines are affected by the changes of modern versions, but is this true? George Vance Smith was a Unitarian scho...lar (sort of like a Jehovah's Witness, they deny the doctrine of the Trinity, the deity of Christ, etc) who worked on the RV committee and wrote a book explaining that the new RV readings favor Unitarian doctrines titled: Texts and margins of the revised New Testament: affecting theological doctrine briefly reviewed. The book's main subject is about how happy Smith was that certain verses were changed to reflect unitarian doctrine. Hort had insisted that a Unitarian serve on the Revision Committee of the RV New Testament. Which sparked a huge controversy at the time. So the very people who worked on the RV, which was the bible perversion that opened the floodgate to many other modern corruptions, clearly said Trinitarian doctrine was changed. Why do modern version supporters keep saying no doctrines are changed when clearly many are? I think having Roman Catholics, Mormons, atheists, liberals, etc., working on the text is disastrous. It is the basis of most modern bibles today. Why don't people who support the critical text such as James White, Stephen Boyce, Dan Wallace, I could name many more, why don't they expose Smith and his Unitarian beliefs? For that matter why don't they expose Jesuit Carlos Martini, liberal Bruce Metzger, and others like the Mormon who worked on the text, like they do Bart Ehrman? It seems critical text proponents hold to a double standard, on one hand, they attack TR/KJV proponents, who are mostly conservatives, but on the other they allow these absolute heretics to work on their text and to make their bible!