Ari Katsoulas, Barrister in Sydney, Australia | Local service

Ari Katsoulas, Barrister

Locality: Sydney, Australia

Phone: 89152006

Address: Second Floor Wentworth Chambers, Level 2 180 Phillip Street 2000 Sydney, NSW, Australia

Website: http://arikatsoulas.com

Likes: 154

Add/Update information

Reviews

Tags

• Local service
• Lawyer & law firm

20.01.2022 On 22 February 2017 NSW Parliament passed an amendment to the Retail Leases Act. Click for a brief summary of key changes

16.01.2022 I appeared for the plaintiff Lord v McMahon in the Supreme Court last year. The matter concerned a real property dispute overlapped with ongoing nuisance and trespass as well as consideration of the Encroachment of Buildings Act 1922. Judgement was delivered last week.

15.01.2022 I recently appeared for Australian Postal Corporation (the Appellant) in an appeal to the Federal Court on the meaning of "reasonable excuse" in s 37(7) of the Safety Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) lead by M Best. The Judgement of Australian Postal Corporation v Nunez [2014] FCA 1095: http://www.austlii.edu.au//au/cases/cth/FCA/2014/1095.html

13.01.2022 I will be delivering two CPD seminars on Monday 21 March for the Tilbury Group at The Royal Automobile Club of Australia on Professional Responsibility in Practice and Family Provision Claims under the Succession Act. If you wish to attend please contact me for further details.

12.01.2022 I recently appeared in the Federal Court of Australia in the matter of Armstrong Scalisi Holdings Pty Ltd v Piscopo (Trustee), in the matter of Collins [2017] FCA 423. In that matter, concerning an application for security for costs, his honour Justice Rares at paragraphs [20] to [28] directs particular comment towards the division of work between solicitors and barristers. https://jade.io/article/528051

12.01.2022 The NSW Court of Appeal in the recent case of Amprimo v Wynn affirmed a first instance decision maintaining a narrow interpretation of eligible persons pursuant to Family Provision claims under the Succession Act 2006. Living in close proximity to the deceased was found to be insufficient in establishing a close personal relationship in the absence of ongoing interaction. Furthermore, an absence of permanency or continuity in living arrangements will be unlikely to amount to being members of the same household for consideration under the Act. - Ari Katsoulas, Barrister

10.01.2022 I recently appeared in the Supreme Court of New South Wales to resist an application for the dismissal of proceedings under s 73(7) of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW)

06.01.2022 The New South Wales Supreme Court 2016 Law Term commences Monday 1 February 2016 (tomorrow). Starting tomorrow the Equity Registrar List will commence earlier with a 9:30am listing